Spending on diverse suppliers averages 3.6%

Report analyzes supplier spend to highlight opportunity for companies interested in diverse spending

Subscriber: Log Out

Even as companies push initiatives to promote diverse supplier programs, many companies are still falling short, and it puts procurement and sourcing professionals in a bind.

A new report from supplier.io, a provider of data and analytics, found that while $1.4 trillion is spent annually on diverse suppliers, the top 10 diverse suppliers received 17% of all diverse spend. The 2023 Supplier Diversity Benchmarking Report tracked actual supplier spend across 466 companies in 15 industries to compile the results.

Diverse spend was defined as “certified diverse spend” from suppliers that have an industry recognized certification that can be confirmed. Self-certified suppliers were not included in the analysis.

The report noted that companies that wanted to support diverse suppliers but included small businesses in their reports received mixed results. In all spend, the report found that 3.6% was spent in certified diverse suppliers across all industries, but when small businesses, which may not be diverse businesses, are included, that figure jumps to 7.5%, potentially leading to misleading results for companies invested in diverse suppliers.

“Accurate and detailed benchmarking is critical to help us all get better and grow our supplier diversity programs. Detailed analysis and actionable insights identify a number of ways organizations can improve, building on the successes of peers across industries,” said Aylin Basom, supplier.io CEO. “We’re thrilled to share our first annual Supplier Diversity Benchmarking Report, which analyzes actual spend and empowers companies to tap into new opportunities to make meaningful improvements in supplier diversity.”

By category, the average spending each category were as follows:

• Small business: 4.2%
• Women-owned: 1.3%
• Minority-business enterprise (MBE): 1.1%
• Veteran-owned: 0.2%
• Disabled-owned: 0.1%
• LQBTQ-owned: 0.1%

The survey found that 80% of companies have less than 5% of their purchases with diverse suppliers, which can lead to missed opportunities to develop new suppliers and diversify the supply base to avoid system shocks.

Certain industries, Supplier.io found, are more likely to leverage diverse suppliers. For instance, the energy industry spends about 9% on diverse suppliers, which the high-tech industry is at 8%, both more than double the overall average. On the other end of the spectrum is the food and beverage and retail industries, spending 1.6% and 2.1% respectively.

When supplier.io looked at best-in-class performers, the spend was even greater. Best-in-class businesses in energy spent an average of 27.8%. High-tech best-in-class performers were at 19.2% and education at 12.2%, far above that sector’s 4.2% overall spend.

Supplier.io noted that benchmarking diversity spend is important for businesses to help them understand opportunities. For instance, looking at several commodity categories offer leaders a clear vision of their diverse supplier spend. Companies in construction (9%), admin and support services (8.6%), and educational services (8%) achieve the highest spend on specific products and services with diverse suppliers, whereas companies in arts, entertainment and recreation (2.3%); healthcare (2%); and manufacturing (2.5%) present the greatest opportunity to invest more in commodity areas.

The report also broke down each diverse group into where opportunity might lie. For instance, companies spend the most with MBE businesses that provide professional, scientific and technical services (5.8%) or educational services (5.6%). But transportation and warehousing (0.98%) tend not to favor MBEs.

Supplier.io advised companies to leverage benchmarking to assess the true health of their supplier diversity program, to look for clear growth areas within their industry, and identify ways to grow by looking at firms outside their industry.

SC
MR

Latest Podcast
Talking Supply Chain: Understanding the FTC’s ban on noncompetes
Crowell & Moring law partner Stefan Meisner joined the Talking Supply Chain podcast to discuss the recent decision by the Federal Trade…
Listen in

About the Author

Brian Straight, SCMR Editor in Chief
Brian Straight's Bio Photo

Brian Straight is the Editor in Chief of Supply Chain Management Review. He has covered trucking, logistics and the broader supply chain for more than 15 years. He lives in Connecticut with his wife and two children. He can be reached at [email protected], @TruckingTalk, on LinkedIn, or by phone at 774-440-3870.

View Brian's author profile.

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service